CouldaShouldaWoulda with Greg Koukl, Part 1
Greg tells us about a time his youthful zeal got the best of him.
CouldaShouldaWoulda with Fazale “Fuz” Rana
Fuz teaches us a valuable lesson: We are more credible when we admit our mistakes.
CouldaShouldaWoulda with Gary Habermas
Gary lets us in on a little secret: Even experts forget things sometimes!
CouldaShouldaWoulda with Sam Allberry, Part 2
Sam reminds us that the best way to answer objections is by being quick to listen and slow to speak.
CouldaShouldaWoulda with Sam Allberry, Part 1
Sam talks about a time he answered a question biblically but accidentally neglected the heart of the questioner.
CouldaShouldaWoulda with Derek Caldwell
Abdu and Derek discuss times they defended themselves instead of their faith.
All Rise: Objection! The Bible Makes Mistakes
Christians believe the Bible was inspired by God, who does not make mistakes. Therefore, the Bible must be without error. However, if an error in the Bible is located, does this mean God did not inspire Christian holy writ? Join Abdu as he cross-examines a claim about the disputed age of King Ahaziah.
All Rise: Objection! Science Debunks the God Hypothesis, Part 2
In the previous episode, medical physicist Scott Symington described his paradigm for understanding the relationship between Christianity and science, which he called STOMA, or symbiotic trending overlapping magisteria. In this episode, Abdu and Scott discuss certain controversial topics in the conversation between religion and science and apply Scott’s STOMA paradigm to them in order to […]
All Rise: Objection! Science Debunks the God Hypothesis, Part 1
Abdu is joined by medical physicist Scott Symington to discuss the relationship between religion and science. Do they intersect or overlap, or are they part of what Stephen Jay Gould called non-overlapping magisteria (NOMA)? Symington proposes an alternative paradigm, STOMA, that holds the potential for mutual benefit between science and, in particular, Christianity.
All Rise: Objection! Christians Engage in Circular Reasoning!
“The Bible is the Word of God because the Bible says it is the Word of God.” If you’ve ever made or heard this argument, you may have heard the accusation that it uses circular reasoning. Is that true? And if so, is it even possible to claim the divine authorship of the Bible without […]
